Mornington Crescent

Games and game-related discussion
User avatar
Raveen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2437
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Solihull
Contact:

Mornington Crescent

Postby Raveen » Wed Jul 31, 2013 2:05 pm

Shall we play forum Mornington Crescent? NJ brought it up and I thought I'd run with it.

We'll play one of the standard deviations so that the less experienced can join in. I propose the SMF variation for forum rules with telefantasy expansions. In this case cross genre shunting is allowed but cross referencing can land you in nidd. The usual forum huff rules apply and play will be fractally non-sequential.

So pretty standard stuff.

I'll kick off with Kings Cross.
ImageImage

User avatar
Idanmel
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:38 pm
Location: Rishon Lezion, Israel
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Idanmel » Wed Jul 31, 2013 2:42 pm

If your post can translate into, "I'm starting a game, everyone is welcome", then I'm all up to it!
Ints kill nans, probes kill bombers.
Image

User avatar
notjarvis
Very Prolific Poster
Very Prolific Poster
Posts: 871
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:53 am
Location: Brum
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby notjarvis » Wed Jul 31, 2013 3:11 pm

That's quite a daring start there Rav. The Kings Cross opening leaves you open to all sorts of trouble down the line.

I'll play Trafalgar to make it easy on you though
<Remember to put something witty in here>

ImageImage

User avatar
Andon
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Andon » Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:09 pm

Could go for an explanation on what the hell this is....

User avatar
notjarvis
Very Prolific Poster
Very Prolific Poster
Posts: 871
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:53 am
Location: Brum
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby notjarvis » Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:52 pm

Surely everyone knows the rules to Mornington Crescent? Especially as Raveen invoked the simple SMF variation.

The Dumbledore-Potter rule set for beginners may have been better IMO, but SMF is quite simple.
I would have suggested buying the complete 2003 book "Morning Crescent Rules and Variations" but it appears to be out of print and I've misplaced my copy....
Last edited by notjarvis on Thu Aug 01, 2013 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
<Remember to put something witty in here>

ImageImage

User avatar
Drakon
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:30 pm

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Drakon » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:32 pm

The link doesn't work for me mate.

And yeah, no clue what you guys are on about.

User avatar
Adept
Very Prolific Poster
Very Prolific Poster
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:21 am

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Adept » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:44 pm

ImageImageImageImageImage

User avatar
Andon
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Andon » Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:49 pm

Ah, it's a British thing. I'm not, so I wouldn't know.

User avatar
Raveen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2437
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Solihull
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Raveen » Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:01 am

Whilst I enjoy the Dumbledore-Potter rule set I feel it glosses over a lot of the tactical subtleties of the game.

Trafalgar was a clever move, not an expected response to the Kings Cross opening at all. Also good that you've opened up the board for future moves. I'll continue with that theme and play Knightsbridge.
ImageImage

LtSpinx
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:15 pm

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby LtSpinx » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:25 am

I'm not too sure on the rules, but I feel Arnos Grove would be a valid move at this point.

User avatar
notjarvis
Very Prolific Poster
Very Prolific Poster
Posts: 871
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:53 am
Location: Brum
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby notjarvis » Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:46 am

Arnos Grove is indeed a valid move, as rule 7 is in play, and that allows for these flashier sorts of moves.

However it opens up the option to shunt Raveen using Brompton Road, which is therefore what I shall do.

Brompton Road
<Remember to put something witty in here>

ImageImage

User avatar
Idanmel
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:38 pm
Location: Rishon Lezion, Israel
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Idanmel » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:10 pm

NJ, I believe the Duff convention clearly states that shunting people so early in the game should be avoided as much as possible.

So, as much as I'd like to Place Rav in Nidd, I think it is better all around that I play Chigwell.
Ints kill nans, probes kill bombers.
Image

User avatar
Wyld Karde
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 1:29 pm
Location: Northamptonshire, UK

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Wyld Karde » Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:15 pm

I'm a little rusty, but my dog-eared copy of Stovald's Fourth has come to my rescue.  I must admit, I'm a little disappointed in Rav, from the strength of play I've seen him produce in our previous games I would've thought he'd have seen a Brompton Shunt coming.  As I've missed the opening rounds I'll take the usual handicap of a pair of red tokens and start with the usual Piccadilly Ploy, as immortalised in the 1978 showdown between Cryer and Garden, where Dr Garden's flamboyant use of the circle line was stopped dead by being unexpectedly placed in Nidd courtesy of Rushden, who was sadly Nidded himself moments later and was effectively out of the match.

Edit: Seems Idan made a move while I was writing that up.  Interesting play on Chigwell, but as there's no immediate effect on my play I'll let my move stand.  Also, jolly sporting of you to avoid placing Rav in Nidd there.  You could get a grand tactical advantage from it, but it would've shut down Rav's play before it could really develop, and at this point in the game that would've sucked out a lot of the fun for him.
-WK
Image

User avatar
Raveen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2437
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Solihull
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby Raveen » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:11 am

Chigwell - Piccadilly opens up the third axis on the board which allows me to take Kentish Town West
ImageImage

User avatar
notjarvis
Very Prolific Poster
Very Prolific Poster
Posts: 871
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:53 am
Location: Brum
Contact:

Re: Mornington Crescent

Postby notjarvis » Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:32 am

Although Kentish Town West opens up many possibilities with the Overground axis coming into play, the risk of using that section is indeed very high.

So I'm going to play it safe and go for the old (but classic) Ripper Evisceration manoeuvre and sneak unseen into Whitechapel
Last edited by notjarvis on Fri Aug 02, 2013 10:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
<Remember to put something witty in here>

ImageImage


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests